Kein Foto

Umland, Andreas

Dr. Gergana Dimova is a Lecturer in Politics at the London Study Centre of Florida State University. She obtained her MA and PhD from Harvard University, and was subsequently a Research Fellow at the University of Cambridge, a Research Associate at the University of Oxford and an associated Lecturer at the University of Winchester. Dimova serves as a commissioning co-editor of Cambridge University Press’s book series “Elements in Politics and Society,” associate editor of the journal Democratic Theory, and convenor of the Politics and Anti-Politics Specialist Group of the UK’s Political Science Association. Dimova is the author of Democracy beyond Elections (Palgrave Macmillan 2019). Her articles have been published in, among other journals, Demokratizatsiya, Democratic Theory, Comparative Political Theory, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, CEU Political Science Journal, Global Media Journal, and Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society.
Russland, Faschismus und Antifaschismus</a>

Russland, Faschismus und Antifaschismus

Zwei Jahre nach Beginn der Großinvasion Russlands in der Ukraine beschuldigen sich beide Länder weiterhin gegenseitig des Faschismus. Einerseits hat Moskau eine kohärente Ideologie um die Idee herum aufgebaut, eine antifaschistische Macht zu sein, die Europa und seine traditionellen Werte vor einer liberal-faschistischen Bedrohung rettet, und rechtfertigt die Invasion im Namen einer Neuauflage des „Großen Vaterländischen Krieges“, also des Zweiten Weltkriegs.

Ukraine’s Decentralization</a>

Ukraine’s Decentralization

After Ukraine’s 2013–14 Revolution of Dignity, much Western attention to Ukrainian domestic policies has been focused on the country’s “Europeanization” in the narrow and technical sense of the word, i.e. to its adoption of EU standards and legislation.

Political Uncertainty</a>

Political Uncertainty

This timely book provides a comprehensive, multi-dimensional and comparative analysis of political uncertainty. It is innovative in introducing the notions of inter-institutional, verbally induced, and historical uncertainty. It argues for an inclusive approach which considers multiple aspects of uncertainty, even when they are of a different nature.